I get a few letters lately asking why I don't discuss politics as much anymore. To be quite honest, politics is somewhat boring. Left, right or in-between, the same cycles regenerate ad infinitum and participating in such is not my goal or desire.
In this world we have many clamoring voices that seek your allegiance. "-isms" of various and sundry philosophies that seek a broader power base.
There is something out there that is much bigger than the petty political ambitions of a small planet on the outskirts of the galaxy in a solar system of little accomplishment. Living life here with a political mindset is like living in a box. You board yourself up with these inflexible views, biases and animosities. You cap this box off with a very limited perspective and set of fundamental fixations.
Your progressive and personal development is the most important thing in the universe for you.
Getting trapped by identifying yourself within the narrow constructs of various "isms" will seriously sabotage your own mental development and horizons.
Be neither left nor right. Be you! We are all so much more than ideologists espousing the political philosophy of some party. Republican, Democrat, Tory, Green, Socialist or what-have-you, all these associations will not help you grow and develop or prepare for your future life - after death. They know nothing of these things and are merely emotional diversions used to distract and consume time of peoples as they live out their lives on this world.
Today I am going to pretend my readers live in the world of 2943, a point in time when the things revealed here are understood and known by all humanity and even grade schoolers have a fundamental overview of these things. This is the sort of lesson a typical 6th grader might hear in his/her classroom.
This world is officially classified as a dwarf intellect world, a hell world wherein 99.9% of the inhabitants are engaged by parasitic entities and are often completely unaware of this parasite-host relationship as they live their daily life. These energy leeches feed on their human hosts for pure energy to sustain them. It is time to explain this energy consumption, generation and consciousness parasite-host relationship. This has gone on for thousands of years, caused untold wars, crimes and suffering and only with the past several hundred years has science been able to track these external parasitic signals and begin the process of both identification and jamming.
The first thought-shield based on fundamental personal frequency identification was developed in 2247. The earliest models had a 50% success ratio but were still incapable of catching very finely matched signals that were within several thousand cycles of the users fundamental thought frequency.
The result of these devices development and incorporation into the homes and dwelling of the people resulted in a drastic drop in the crime rates and among the mentally ill.
In America, circa 1999, statistical archives tell us 54 million Americans were mentally ill each year and only 9 million sought treatment. 12 million US women were depressed each year, 6 million men were depressed, 2.5 million were classified schizophrenic, 1 million more were bipolar and untold millions had eating disorders identified at the time as bulimia nervosa or anorexia nervosa.
And those who did seek treatment received a prescription for one or another popular inhibitor type drugs which blocked or disrupted brain function. And the world of this really considered itself technologically advanced! At this point the world knew absolutely nothing of the true causes of mental illness, much less treatment.
Everyone on this planet will be "mentally ill" at some point in time and to one degree or another. Our thoughts are not solely our own because our minds are being used like an ancient two-party telephone call. The reason millions of folks are mentally disturbed is because they share their minds with other hostile entities - other beings that talk for them, override their mind and dominate them, leaving their still small voice tied up to a chair in the corner.
These beings do not care for any person, although they may develop a certain frequency attachment to a longtime host and actually personalize and identify with their host human. They eat, smoke, drink, have sexual relations, and more via their host body.
Schizophrenics are merely the most clear examples of this mind-possession, yet it occurs around everyone daily in small ways. Someone eats in front of you, and although you weren't the slightest bit hungry you suddenly are "hungry" or have "appetite". These are garden variety, run of the mill food-parasite-entities. They now override your mind and decide you will eat. Obesity was widespread and caused by food-parasites that satiated their material desire to eat through a host body. They could leave their host body at any time and move on to others and eat twenty meals in a row at a "fast food restaurant", and never gain a single pound - while their weak minded victims suffered from their parasitic pleasure. Fortunately the world is much slimmer now as the result of this awareness and thought monitoring.
In olden times folks would engage in sexual relations and then immediately regret it after the act was over. What was going on was the parasitic entity or entities would use them and then after they were through they would leave and move right on to other fresh victims - leaving the host alone with their own still small voice - one that was often "ashamed" and unhappy that it let itself be overridden and dominated. One of the greatest benefits of this realization has been in the more intelligent and properly matched sexual pairing of humans on this world. No more animal-like, parasite-driven relationships bringing unwanted and lower frequency children into the world.
What is the science behind the parasitic thought hijacking?
How does this work?
It's actually a very simple physics process. As you all know, every thought and nerve impulse has a frequency and a wavelength. Thoughts are just signals. Signals can be overridden and can carry piggyback waveform structures called subharmonic structures. Repeat after me class, sub-har-mon-ic struc-tures. Very good.
Subharmonics are like the trojan worms which tried to, and often successfully did, take over Microsoft windows run computers back in the 21st century. They worked undetected and most people never even realized they were there - in the background - awaiting opportunities to influence, distort and corrupt data and insert their own.
When people's bodies die their consciousness remains. No one has ever died in the conventional sense, by merely losing a physical body. Our minds live on as quantized field comprised of signals of incredibly high frequencies. Channel 2 on the ancient "tele-vision" sets broadcast at 88 million cycles per second. This is, of course, like slow motion when compared to human thoughts.
The thought process is not so much a thinking mechanism as it is a sorting mechanism. Exposure to signals generates a response which triggers memories and thoughts that respond to the original stimuli. It is not finite and there is no limit to the signals that can be shared on or near any given frequency. The conscious mind will resonate with the strongest signal, but the subharmonics of any signal will influence the thought train.
Back in the 21st century they had a huge pharmaceutical industry that profited by disrupting cell to cell signal transfer. Aspirin was the first practical product after cocaine in Coca Cola had been discovered to alter the minds of the drinkers. The bloodstream carried this cocaine to the brain cells and atrophied certain brain centers.
Many minds and bodies were destroyed by drugs, millions more were popping "happy pills" to keep them in an artificial state of euphoria or at least something besides severe depression. Naturally, these folks developed tolerances for many of these chemicals and larger and larger doses were employed. The side effects suffered by this poisoning of the body were horrendous. It was a time which can be described as a true dark age of medicine where unscrupulous companies and greedy, ignorant physicians would prescribe all sorts of toxins as temporary cures. Not much had changed since the alcohol-laced medicines that quacks would prescribe in the 19th century to dull the minds of the patient/victim.
No one understood that thoughts were electronic and not just chemical in nature. They did not understand that frequencies of signals triggered and controlled the brains chemical reaction. The brain of an individual was not angry or depressed because of chemical imbalance, but rather the chemical balance at any given moment is the byproduct of these various thought frequencies! Like the tail wagging the dog, drugs naturally did nothing to alter the causal agents - the original thought process. So, as a result, these victims would get even more depressed, even suicidal, because the chemical suppression actually strengthened the negative thought form!
Yes, it is horrifying to think people used to live that way. But I see our time is through for today. Tomorrow we will discuss the drug-prohibition act of 2345 so I expect you to read up on it with your holopods.
Till later!
scc
Saturday, August 26, 2006
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
Tom Cruise, Paramount & Drug Companies
I'm not a big fan of Tom Cruise. I've seen several of his movies over the years and they're generally B- or C+ affairs. That said, I'm going to do a little curtain lifting on the recent entertainment news headlines.
You may have read about Tom Cruise's contract being dropped by Paramount Pictures - a Viacom holding. You will find out that his Scientology beliefs are not the cause of his being dropped, but rather a concerted push by pharmaceutical companies whose advertising helps keep Viacom afloat.
Tom Cruise has made Paramount Pictures a lot of money over the years. Somewhere in the vicinity of 2-1/2 billion dollars. Problem for Tom is that's chump change next to the Pharmaceutical industry's expenditures in Viacom, Paramount's owner.
Sumner Redstone and Viacom hold a whole bunch of media interests. To list them all would be tiresome, but they include CBS, MTV, BET and Simon & Schuster, VH1, Comedy Central, hundreds of radio stations across the US, thousands of theatres around the world, Star Trek, Pocket Books...etcetera.
Most all these companies do ADVERTISING. Advertising keeps them in business. Commercials pay for Comedy Central, CBS, Radio stations, MTV et al.
The pharmaceutical industry will spend 3-1/2 billion dollars a YEAR selling drugs to the public via various media franchises. That's more money in a single year than Tom Cruise has made for Paramount in the past 20 years. The pharmaceutical industry doesn't advertise drugs for nothing - they expect a HUGE return. Their 3-1/2 billion dollar investment will reap a big payoff - about 400 billion dollars per annum in retail sales of drugs.
Antidepressants are big business. "Authorities" estimate 15-20 million Americans are clinically depressed every year. Depression is no longer just a mood though - it is now an illness and pharmaceutical companies target everyone from preschoolers to senior citizens for their antidepressant drugs:
Trends in Antidepressant Use1
Release date: May 16, 2005
1Trends in Antidepressant Use. AHRQ News and Numbers, May 16, 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/nn/nn051605.htm
As you can see drug companies have made major inroads into their goal of a public who buys a drug for literally everything. Cradle to grave customers of drugs. Antidepressants are the largest part of this "drug everybody" push.
Tom Cruise suggesting antidepressants were bad was like punching Viacom right in the gut. All of Viacom's holdings make their money from pharmaceutical advertising. The more money the drug companies make - the more they spend on commercials, print and radio advertising.
So Tom Cruise's erratic behavior wasn't Scientology - he's been pushing that cult for 20 years and no one blinked. It's only when Tom put Brooke Shields on the spot, after news came out that she wanted to kill her baby, about her antidepressant usage, that Tom seriously ticked off the powers that be.
How dare he? When a media personality talks, a surprisingly large number of folks listen. Tom probably has already cost pharmaceutical companies somewhere in the vicinity of 50-150 million dollars in global sales by folks who either stopped taking antidepressants or who have postponed jumping on the Zolofttm bandwagon.
Sure they have found out that folks on antidepressants, especially kids, become suicidal - but hey, to pharmaceutical companies, suicide is better than being depressed.
Unfortunately, these companies and the FDA don't understand diddly about almost all the drugs they market and promote. Mix a batch of chemicals and then briefly experiment on folks for a few dozen months. They see how the test subjects behave, count the list of side effects see which one can be hyped as a cure.
Raptuurtm - reducing the apparent onset of tourette's syndrome as experienced by rap musicians. Side effects are seizures, impotence, gastronomical disturbances, vomiting, memory loss, depression, headaches, dry mouth and incontinence - but hey, a new drug is born! BILLION$ of the public's dollars are the payoff for what amounts to legal poisoning.
With so little understanding of the brain and its function, they are like children playing with chemical sets. Only these 'kids' have the FDA and the doctors in their pocket, rubber stamping and prescribing stuff that turns out to be deadly.
So Tom, take some advice, as you can see even a "Top Gun" actor's lifetime gross sales are just a drop in the bucket next to the yearly expenditures and power of pharmaceutical companies.
Lifting the curtains on the media is always fun. Hiring the somewhat mentally disturbed Southpark creators was timely cover, to make it look like the conflict was purely about his Scientology beliefs, when in reality it was purely the response to cuts in pharmaceutical advertising all across Viacom's holdings. After Dan Rather's blog-exposed fraudulent news and the lowering value of CBS stock, Paramount - or more properly VIACOM can't afford Tom Cruise anymore. He's now far more expensive to keep than to let go.
Watch for Tom's production company to sign up with some firm with fewer holdings dependant upon pharmaceutical advertising.
So a new word for the media lexicon:
erratic =anti-antidepressants.
You may have read about Tom Cruise's contract being dropped by Paramount Pictures - a Viacom holding. You will find out that his Scientology beliefs are not the cause of his being dropped, but rather a concerted push by pharmaceutical companies whose advertising helps keep Viacom afloat.
Tom Cruise has made Paramount Pictures a lot of money over the years. Somewhere in the vicinity of 2-1/2 billion dollars. Problem for Tom is that's chump change next to the Pharmaceutical industry's expenditures in Viacom, Paramount's owner.
Sumner Redstone and Viacom hold a whole bunch of media interests. To list them all would be tiresome, but they include CBS, MTV, BET and Simon & Schuster, VH1, Comedy Central, hundreds of radio stations across the US, thousands of theatres around the world, Star Trek, Pocket Books...etcetera.
Most all these companies do ADVERTISING. Advertising keeps them in business. Commercials pay for Comedy Central, CBS, Radio stations, MTV et al.
The pharmaceutical industry will spend 3-1/2 billion dollars a YEAR selling drugs to the public via various media franchises. That's more money in a single year than Tom Cruise has made for Paramount in the past 20 years. The pharmaceutical industry doesn't advertise drugs for nothing - they expect a HUGE return. Their 3-1/2 billion dollar investment will reap a big payoff - about 400 billion dollars per annum in retail sales of drugs.
Antidepressants are big business. "Authorities" estimate 15-20 million Americans are clinically depressed every year. Depression is no longer just a mood though - it is now an illness and pharmaceutical companies target everyone from preschoolers to senior citizens for their antidepressant drugs:
Trends in Antidepressant Use1
Release date: May 16, 2005
The percentage of Americans taking antidepressant drugs increased from 5.6 percent in 1997 to 8.5 percent in 2002, according to the most recent government data from the Federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
The data, from AHRQ's Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, track prescription drug use among Americans not living in psychiatric hospitals or other institutions or serving in the military. Over-the-counter medicines and free samples were not included in the estimates.
Although antidepressant use was higher in 2002 than in 1997 for women or girls and men or boys, the rate of increase was higher for women or girls.
Antidepressant use by women or girls increased from 7.4 percent to 11.4 during the 5-year period.
Antidepressant use by men or boys increased from 3.8 percent to 5.4 percent.
Antidepressant use for people age 65 and older jumped from 9.3 percent in 1997 to 13.2 percent in 2002.
For people 18-64, the increase was from 6.8 percent to 10.3 percent.
1Trends in Antidepressant Use. AHRQ News and Numbers, May 16, 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gov/news/nn/nn051605.htm
As you can see drug companies have made major inroads into their goal of a public who buys a drug for literally everything. Cradle to grave customers of drugs. Antidepressants are the largest part of this "drug everybody" push.
Tom Cruise suggesting antidepressants were bad was like punching Viacom right in the gut. All of Viacom's holdings make their money from pharmaceutical advertising. The more money the drug companies make - the more they spend on commercials, print and radio advertising.
So Tom Cruise's erratic behavior wasn't Scientology - he's been pushing that cult for 20 years and no one blinked. It's only when Tom put Brooke Shields on the spot, after news came out that she wanted to kill her baby, about her antidepressant usage, that Tom seriously ticked off the powers that be.
How dare he? When a media personality talks, a surprisingly large number of folks listen. Tom probably has already cost pharmaceutical companies somewhere in the vicinity of 50-150 million dollars in global sales by folks who either stopped taking antidepressants or who have postponed jumping on the Zolofttm bandwagon.
Sure they have found out that folks on antidepressants, especially kids, become suicidal - but hey, to pharmaceutical companies, suicide is better than being depressed.
Unfortunately, these companies and the FDA don't understand diddly about almost all the drugs they market and promote. Mix a batch of chemicals and then briefly experiment on folks for a few dozen months. They see how the test subjects behave, count the list of side effects see which one can be hyped as a cure.
Raptuurtm - reducing the apparent onset of tourette's syndrome as experienced by rap musicians. Side effects are seizures, impotence, gastronomical disturbances, vomiting, memory loss, depression, headaches, dry mouth and incontinence - but hey, a new drug is born! BILLION$ of the public's dollars are the payoff for what amounts to legal poisoning.
With so little understanding of the brain and its function, they are like children playing with chemical sets. Only these 'kids' have the FDA and the doctors in their pocket, rubber stamping and prescribing stuff that turns out to be deadly.
So Tom, take some advice, as you can see even a "Top Gun" actor's lifetime gross sales are just a drop in the bucket next to the yearly expenditures and power of pharmaceutical companies.
Lifting the curtains on the media is always fun. Hiring the somewhat mentally disturbed Southpark creators was timely cover, to make it look like the conflict was purely about his Scientology beliefs, when in reality it was purely the response to cuts in pharmaceutical advertising all across Viacom's holdings. After Dan Rather's blog-exposed fraudulent news and the lowering value of CBS stock, Paramount - or more properly VIACOM can't afford Tom Cruise anymore. He's now far more expensive to keep than to let go.
Watch for Tom's production company to sign up with some firm with fewer holdings dependant upon pharmaceutical advertising.
So a new word for the media lexicon:
erratic =anti-antidepressants.
Wednesday, August 02, 2006
Amnesty International - a front for France Telecom
Today, it's time for some more curtain lifting on the various corrupt activities going on around the world. You have probably heard of Amnesty International - a "humanitarian" organization that helps folks all around the world. What you didn't know is that Amnesty International is just a front for French Telecom.
Amnesty International is run by an International Executive Committee (IEC) this group of a handful of members oversees Amnesty International's activities. One of the IEC is Claire Paponneau, who is from France, is a member of the IEC and is AI's International Treasurer, having been first elected to this role in 2001. She has been a member of the Board of AI France and was its Treasurer from 1995 to 2001. Previously she was a member of AI's Financial Control Committee.
Here's what AI doesn't tell you:
"Claire Paponneau is Executive Vice-President of International Carrier Services and Sales for France Telecom's carrier wholesale division that provides Open Transit® Bandwidth, Internet, Voice and Mobile services. Before taking up her current position in December 2001, Claire was Executive Vice-President of Networks and Services Operations, managing international operator services, audio and video transport services and transmission and added value switched services."
Take a look at a recent news piece where AI criticizes Google, Yahoo and other US companies:
Amnesty International is run by an International Executive Committee (IEC) this group of a handful of members oversees Amnesty International's activities. One of the IEC is Claire Paponneau, who is from France, is a member of the IEC and is AI's International Treasurer, having been first elected to this role in 2001. She has been a member of the Board of AI France and was its Treasurer from 1995 to 2001. Previously she was a member of AI's Financial Control Committee.
Here's what AI doesn't tell you:
"Claire Paponneau is Executive Vice-President of International Carrier Services and Sales for France Telecom's carrier wholesale division that provides Open Transit® Bandwidth, Internet, Voice and Mobile services. Before taking up her current position in December 2001, Claire was Executive Vice-President of Networks and Services Operations, managing international operator services, audio and video transport services and transmission and added value switched services."
Take a look at a recent news piece where AI criticizes Google, Yahoo and other US companies:
Amnesty International Criticizes US companies
Once one knows who pulls the strings at AI we see how devious France Telecom's corporate warfare is - using a front "humanitarian organization" to damn the US competition and to get them in the door in the third world! Not surprisingly France Telecom is not on Amnesty Internationals list - even though Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom does exactly the same thing as these US companies and was criticized by European Parliament.
Third world nations don't open the door when the knocker says "Hi France Telecom! We're here to set up phone service." But they will open the door when the answer is "It's Amnesty International - we're here to help you poor victims"
It's quite ingenious.
Currently we have AI telling the world that Hezbollah are placing rockets near civilians - but not as often as the Israeli army contends. They deliberately seem to be taking sides with Hezbollah against Israel. Why? When one realizes one is hearing France Telecom's commercial interests every time AI issues a press release, we realize that Lebanon uses France Telecom. They are protecting their corporate interests and customers:
" The Lebanese Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications signed a contract with France Telecom for the operator to build and operate a global system for mobile (GSM) communications phone network. The contract was signed by the French operator's France Telecom Mobiles International subsidiary."
This was back in 1994.
Will this realization earn me a Pulitzer Prize for investigative journalism? Of course not. Only the left side of the aisle earns those. I can expect a few kicks in the teeth and knocks on the back of the head.
So when you hear Amnesty International demonize the US - you will know exactly what's going on. France Telecom is pushing itself in deeper in the third world and collecting money from the 3rd world countries.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)